http://infotech.lakeviewchurch.org/2007/09/04/view-email-headers-of-attached-forwarded-messages-in-outlook-2003/ David Szpunar: Network & Systems Manager, Lakeview Church Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:14:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://infotech.lakeviewchurch.org/2007/09/04/view-email-headers-of-attached-forwarded-messages-in-outlook-2003/#comment-395 David Szpunar Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:12:30 +0000 http://infotech.lakeviewchurch.org/2007/09/04/view-email-headers-of-attached-forwarded-messages-in-outlook-2003/#comment-395 Well, it got through the spam filtering service (it's an MXLogic reseller) to us, but not from us back to them, so that's part of what they're trying to investigate...why would their filters catch it when the same filters didn't on its way to us? Sorry if it wasn't clear enough...if my user hasn't deleted the email I could go and get the headers from their Outlook directly. But that's a lot to ask when they should just be able to forward it to me to take care of. Well, it got through the spam filtering service (it’s an MXLogic reseller) to us, but not from us back to them, so that’s part of what they’re trying to investigate…why would their filters catch it when the same filters didn’t on its way to us? Sorry if it wasn’t clear enough…if my user hasn’t deleted the email I could go and get the headers from their Outlook directly. But that’s a lot to ask when they should just be able to forward it to me to take care of.

]]> http://infotech.lakeviewchurch.org/2007/09/04/view-email-headers-of-attached-forwarded-messages-in-outlook-2003/#comment-394 Jim Walton Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:04:16 +0000 http://infotech.lakeviewchurch.org/2007/09/04/view-email-headers-of-attached-forwarded-messages-in-outlook-2003/#comment-394 Since it got through your spam filter the first time, why don't you have him just forward it to you, then you would have the header. Just a thought, although it has risks, I'm sure. Since it got through your spam filter the first time, why don’t you have him just forward it to you, then you would have the header. Just a thought, although it has risks, I’m sure.

]]>